The port and woofer resonances are so loud that they push through the overall response.
TAKEN 3 BLUERAY DRIVER
It is uneven and suffers from a number of 'acoustic events.' We can easily see their causes if we measure each driver and port in near-field: I must say, I was very disappointed to see so many issues in the on-axis response.
Back panel has combined the small port with binding posts which should reduce manufacturing cost: Taking it off you see an upside down configuration with tweeter on the bottom:
It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $249 on Amazon including Prime shipping. This is a review and detailed measurements of the PSB Alpha P3 bookshelf, 2-way speaker. are welcome.Īny donations are much appreciated using : You don't have to be an owner to do so.Īs always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. NOTE: there is a poll on top where you can rate this speaker as well. Competition is strong here with many good options.
TAKEN 3 BLUERAY HOW TO
Company knows how to do better and needs to do that even in budget class. Given the fact that my ears are plugged up, I am going to put most emphasis on objective measurements and say that I can't recommend the PSB Alpha P3. I appreciate that they are trying to keep the size and cost down but at the same time, I have a minimum bar of fidelity I like to see and the P3 misses that by fair margin. Alas, none of that was delivered here with response that is very uneven with many indications of the problem areas. I have high expectations from PSB given company/designer's work at NRC and with Dr. On the other hand, the bass becomes distorted tubby sounding. On one hand they took power well for how little they are. When it was all done, the highs were more pleasing but still not quite right.Īs noted in the measurements, I had to really crank up my amplifier to drive these. I went back and forth on it as some tracks sounded better with it or the other way around. Depending on your room modes, this may or may not be necessary. Otherwise the EQ may sound worse in quick AB testing even though it is doing the right thing. Whenever you filter out different bands you reduce overall volume so it is very important to compensate for that. Notice how I actually increased levels across the board to make the subjective loudness the same. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws: Likewise listening tests are performed per research that shows mono listening is much more revealing of differences between speakers than stereo or multichannel.Īcoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker is and how it can be used in a room. Measurements are compliant with latest speaker research into what can predict the speaker preference and is standardized in CEA/CTA-2034 ANSI specifications. Reference axis for measurements was the center of the tweeter. I performed over 1000 measurement which resulted in error rate of roughly 1%. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than an anechoic chamber. It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics and dual scan) to subtract room reflections (so where I measure it doesn't matter). Measurements that you are about to see were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). I was surprised that the model marking and such was under the unit.
1 kommentar(er)
